Rebuild of S.H. MonsterArts 1.1 [ABRIDGED]

For the discussion of Toho toys, models, figures and other collectibles of this nature.
Post Reply
User avatar
shadowgigan
Futurian
Posts: 3159
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2012 12:11 pm

Re: Rebuild of S.H. MonsterArts 1.1 [ABRIDGED]

Post by shadowgigan »

Legion1979 wrote: Tue Jan 17, 2023 8:55 am Going off that, I'm not sure why everyone is convinced a 1968-1972 Godzilla is coming. A 1974 version certainly didn't join Mechagodzilla.
I mean this is a fair point.

User avatar
Petezilla
Gotengo Officer
Posts: 1917
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 1:49 am

Re: Rebuild of S.H. MonsterArts 1.1 [ABRIDGED]

Post by Petezilla »

Unfortunately everything Legion said is a fair point.
Last edited by Petezilla on Tue Jan 17, 2023 12:45 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Image
Size DOES matter!

User avatar
miguelnuva
Justiriser
Posts: 18449
Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2010 6:32 pm

Re: Rebuild of S.H. MonsterArts 1.1 [ABRIDGED]

Post by miguelnuva »

I didn't see anyone saying a 68 is coming we were saying we wanted a 68-72 Goji.
Mothra vs Godzilla> Gojira

Shadow Area 1-0
Image Image

User avatar
Platypus Prime
Interpol Agent
Posts: 589
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2020 1:20 pm

Re: Rebuild of S.H. MonsterArts 1.1 [ABRIDGED]

Post by Platypus Prime »

For the train, it's just a cheap little Micro machines Trains set, there are lots of types and even in package are cheap on ebay. I just wanted something close enough to look good. No motors or anything, it just slides back and forth on the simple plastic track.

User avatar
SoggyNoodles2016
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 6144
Joined: Wed May 30, 2018 7:37 am
Location: My parents' basement

Re: Rebuild of S.H. MonsterArts 1.1 [ABRIDGED]

Post by SoggyNoodles2016 »

Both the surveys with figures and the constant 50th anniversary Showa characters show a bit more interest in Showa then before.

I'm not expecting 1968, as much as I joke. Tbh, my best guess would be a 1975. Terror of Mechagodzilla isn't very popular but it's seen as the definite look for the late 70s Godzilla from what I've seen
Image

RIP Evan.

User avatar
Platypus Prime
Interpol Agent
Posts: 589
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2020 1:20 pm

Re: Rebuild of S.H. MonsterArts 1.1 [ABRIDGED]

Post by Platypus Prime »

Eh, could be worse. My Monsterarts 'Holy Grail' would be a King Kong Vs. Godzilla Kong, with interchangeable long and short arms, an alternate 'totally drunk out of his mind' head, and maybe a 1930's style head as a bonus, plus several drinking barrels. I don't expect that to EVER be made. Though he DID spend a lot of that movie a bit out of it...
Last edited by Platypus Prime on Tue Jan 17, 2023 4:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
_JNavs_
Keizer
Posts: 9657
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2019 7:59 pm
Location: New York

Re: Rebuild of S.H. MonsterArts 1.1 [ABRIDGED]

Post by _JNavs_ »

Yeah every comment on the last page was in regards to *wanting* a 1968 Godzilla release. Then everyone agreed it’s essentially *The* Showa Godzilla suit if SHMA were to ever pick another Showa era Godzilla design.

Added in 1 minute 38 seconds:
Platypus Prime wrote: Tue Jan 17, 2023 4:09 pm Eh, could be worse. My Monsterarts 'Holy Grail' would be a King Kong Vs. Godzilla Kong, with interchangeable long and short arms, an alternate 'totally drunk out of his mind' head, and maybe a 1930's style head as a bonus, plus several drinking barrels. I don't expect that to EVER be made. Though he DID spend a lot of that movie a bit out of it...
Need this :lol:
____________________________ImageImage___________________________
Instagram: @Lord.Gojira

User avatar
CyberZilla
Gotengo Officer
Posts: 1587
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2015 1:21 pm
Location: Drifting among the stars, lost in thought

Re: Rebuild of S.H. MonsterArts 1.1 [ABRIDGED]

Post by CyberZilla »

Platypus Prime wrote: Tue Jan 17, 2023 4:09 pm Eh, could be worse. My Monsterarts 'Holy Grail' would be a King Kong Vs. Godzilla Kong, with interchangeable long and short arms, an alternate 'totally drunk out of his mind' head, and maybe a 1930's style head as a bonus, plus several drinking barrels. I don't expect that to EVER be made. Though he DID spend a lot of that movie a bit out of it...
To add to that, a SHMA Giant Octopus/Oodako would be hilarious/cool, complete with more barrels and some miniature tribesfolk accessories. It would never happen, even if ‘62 Kong made it to the line, but I sure can dream.
“You gave me strength. So did the others. No life is worthless. I believe you now."
Resized Image Resized Image :shingodzillapurple:Resized ImageResized Image:KingGhidorah64: Resized Image :godzilla2021blue: :kingkong1962:

Is your war… finally over?
Resized Image

User avatar
Petezilla
Gotengo Officer
Posts: 1917
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 1:49 am

Re: Rebuild of S.H. MonsterArts 1.1 [ABRIDGED]

Post by Petezilla »

If the '62 Toho King Kong wouldn't be such a licensing mess they'd have already done one to go with their' 62 Godzilla in the wake of the Legendary movie. That specific Kong design sadly seems to be so completely unavailable for BANDAI to use at all that even the respective movie poster was the only one that was blatantly missing from that neat BANDAI movie poster magnet collection, which otherwise featured every Godzilla movie poster from 1954 to the time of release in 2002.
Image
Size DOES matter!

User avatar
Mac Daddy MM
Xilien Halfling
Posts: 5050
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2017 5:27 pm

Re: Rebuild of S.H. MonsterArts 1.1 [ABRIDGED]

Post by Mac Daddy MM »

I still question if there really is any actual "legal mess" to 1962 Kong, or if Toho in general is just too lazy to sort it out.


Quote of the Year:
plasmabeam wrote: Tue Dec 05, 2023 3:03 am Hear me out on this. What if Godzilla is actually Suko’s father? In GvK when Godzilla defeated Kong and they were roaring at each other, what if Godzilla inseminated Kong at that moment and that’s why they were screaming?

Legion1979
Justiriser
Posts: 16002
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 7:45 pm

Re: Rebuild of S.H. MonsterArts 1.1 [ABRIDGED]

Post by Legion1979 »

Mac Daddy MM wrote: Wed Jan 18, 2023 10:49 am I still question if there really is any actual "legal mess" to 1962 Kong, or if Toho in general is just too lazy to sort it out.
Not laziness. If Toho could find a way to make money off something they'd do it in a heartbeat. Keep in mind Toho is not only ridiculously litigious, they also fear things coming back around to them and getting sued. If there's even the most remote possibility that they might get in legal trouble for doing anything, or if they're not 110% sure who owns the rights to what, they avoid dealing with it.

User avatar
SoggyNoodles2016
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 6144
Joined: Wed May 30, 2018 7:37 am
Location: My parents' basement

Re: Rebuild of S.H. MonsterArts 1.1 [ABRIDGED]

Post by SoggyNoodles2016 »

CyberZilla wrote: Tue Jan 17, 2023 7:37 pm
Platypus Prime wrote: Tue Jan 17, 2023 4:09 pm Eh, could be worse. My Monsterarts 'Holy Grail' would be a King Kong Vs. Godzilla Kong, with interchangeable long and short arms, an alternate 'totally drunk out of his mind' head, and maybe a 1930's style head as a bonus, plus several drinking barrels. I don't expect that to EVER be made. Though he DID spend a lot of that movie a bit out of it...
To add to that, a SHMA Giant Octopus/Oodako would be hilarious/cool, complete with more barrels and some miniature tribesfolk accessories. It would never happen, even if ‘62 Kong made it to the line, but I sure can dream.
It's always funny to me that the most basic Showa kaiju designs (Oodako, Kumonga, Kamacuras, Ebirah) would unironically be FANTASTIC Monsterarts for that reason, as their basic biology would require some insane articulations.
Image

RIP Evan.

User avatar
canofhumdingers
EDF Instructor
Posts: 2111
Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2013 2:34 pm

Re: Rebuild of S.H. MonsterArts 1.1 [ABRIDGED]

Post by canofhumdingers »

Legion1979 wrote: Wed Jan 18, 2023 11:26 am
Mac Daddy MM wrote: Wed Jan 18, 2023 10:49 am I still question if there really is any actual "legal mess" to 1962 Kong, or if Toho in general is just too lazy to sort it out.
Not laziness. If Toho could find a way to make money off something they'd do it in a heartbeat. Keep in mind Toho is not only ridiculously litigious, they also fear things coming back around to them and getting sued. If there's even the most remote possibility that they might get in legal trouble for doing anything, or if they're not 110% sure who owns the rights to what, they avoid dealing with it.
Yeah, I also suspect it’s not laziness. It’s fear (the cowards). But I also suspect it wouldn’t be THAT hard to sort out if they really cared. Heck, I’m sure they own the likeness. Why not just make him and call it “Drunken Monkey” or something. It seems most of the Kong rights issues are tied up in the actual name “King Kong” anyway…

User avatar
Poe Ghostal
JXSDF Technician
Posts: 1026
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 11:16 am

Re: Rebuild of S.H. MonsterArts 1.1 [ABRIDGED]

Post by Poe Ghostal »

The Kong '62 situation reminders me of the way the merch rights to the 1960s Batman TV show were tied up in legal knots for decades. That was finally sorted out in 2012, so never say never.
Poe Ghostal's Points of Articulation - Toy news, reviews, & commentary

User avatar
Jetty_Jags
G-Grasper
Posts: 1360
Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2019 5:27 am

Re: Rebuild of S.H. MonsterArts 1.1 [ABRIDGED]

Post by Jetty_Jags »

What are the takeaways from the idw attempt at using mechanikong?
He Jock it Made of Steel

Online
User avatar
John Pannozzi
Monsterland Worker
Posts: 209
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 5:11 pm

Re: Rebuild of S.H. MonsterArts 1.1 [ABRIDGED]

Post by John Pannozzi »

Jetty_Jags wrote: Wed Jan 18, 2023 12:38 pm What are the takeaways from the idw attempt at using mechanikong?
What IDW attempt at using MechaniKong?
Friends don't lie.

User avatar
Shenanigans
JXSDF Technician
Posts: 1002
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2020 12:00 pm

Re: Rebuild of S.H. MonsterArts 1.1 [ABRIDGED]

Post by Shenanigans »

John Pannozzi wrote: Wed Jan 18, 2023 6:22 pm
Jetty_Jags wrote: Wed Jan 18, 2023 12:38 pm What are the takeaways from the idw attempt at using mechanikong?
What IDW attempt at using MechaniKong?
An artist tried to throw a tiny Mechani-Kong in the background as an Easter Egg but Toho requested he alter the design anyways. Evidently they're still quite wary of using Mechani-Kong in any capacity, even a tiny background cameo.

Regretfully, Petezilla is correct; if there was ever a time to get shit sorted out, it probably would've been to coincide with his first rematch with Godzilla in 60 years. Though I will say with Kong, its not just Toho's Kongs who could use more toys; there's a distinct lack of merchandise for all the pre-2005 Kongs. Most Kong figures feature generic designs, and there's quite a few (Kong '76, Kiko, Lady Kong) who as far as I know don't have any proper figures.

User avatar
Havoks
Interpol Agent
Posts: 415
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 10:59 pm

Re: Rebuild of S.H. MonsterArts 1.1 [ABRIDGED]

Post by Havoks »

I would wonder why Toho hasn’t just outright bought the rights for their version of Kong and Mechani-Kong, or even found a way to do so. I don’t know how many hoops they’d have to jump through but I don’t think it’d be terrible leap to dive in to wrangle up all these rights issues. Never say never.
Last edited by Havoks on Thu Jan 19, 2023 8:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
:terrestris:

Legion1979
Justiriser
Posts: 16002
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 7:45 pm

Re: Rebuild of S.H. MonsterArts 1.1 [ABRIDGED]

Post by Legion1979 »

Havoks wrote: Thu Jan 19, 2023 8:43 am I would wonder why Toho hasn’t just outright bought the rights for their version of Kong and Mechani-Kong, or even found a way to do so.
Probably beciase it's not that simple. The rights situation with Kong has been a mess for decades.
I don’t know how many hoops they’d have to jump through but I don’t think it’d be terrible leap to dive in to wrangle up all these rights issues. Never say never.
That's not really Toho's style. Who do you think they are? Disney?
Last edited by Legion1979 on Thu Jan 19, 2023 9:29 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Mac Daddy MM
Xilien Halfling
Posts: 5050
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2017 5:27 pm

Re: Rebuild of S.H. MonsterArts 1.1 [ABRIDGED]

Post by Mac Daddy MM »

Legion1979 wrote: Thu Jan 19, 2023 9:29 am
That's not really Toho's style. Who do you think they are? Disney?
I mean, you never know in time. ;)

I don't know, I'm still a pretty firm believer that most issues like this could just be solved by a few phone calls between high level execs and their lawyers. In this case, Toho, Universal and a representative from the Cooper estate. It's not like a movie over 60 years old is really going to make the companies go all-out on one another in law suits. Toho only really got pussified over Kong from back in the '90s when Turner of all people claimed he owned the character (he doesn't). After that... They've shied away from even mentioning the monster outside of the movie's title, save a few exceptions.

And before someone responds, I know this type of "call" isn't how things work in the business world. It just seems like it'd be an easy fix for a problem that's complicated for no real reason do to time.
Last edited by Mac Daddy MM on Thu Jan 19, 2023 9:59 am, edited 1 time in total.


Quote of the Year:
plasmabeam wrote: Tue Dec 05, 2023 3:03 am Hear me out on this. What if Godzilla is actually Suko’s father? In GvK when Godzilla defeated Kong and they were roaring at each other, what if Godzilla inseminated Kong at that moment and that’s why they were screaming?

Post Reply