The Paleontology Thread

For the discussion of topics not already covered by the other categories.
User avatar
Voyager
Keizer
Posts: 9236
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:34 pm
Location: On the High Seas

Re: The Paleontology Thread

Post by Voyager »

JAGzilla wrote: Sat Jan 04, 2025 8:58 pm
GojiFan1999 wrote: Sat Jan 04, 2025 4:58 am Diplodocus is a great choice! I’ve always had a soft spot for T. rex, though—there’s just something about how it dominates the scene, you know? I love reading up on how it moved and hunted, though I also find it fascinating how peaceful giants like diplodocus were. I’ve read a bit about its long neck and how it could reach high branches, which is pretty cool. What drew you to diplodocus?
Diplodocus is a great choice, but I think you're replying to a post from 2013 made by a member who hasn't posted in years.

Sorry to go off topic, but a quick question: what is your favorite Showa entry that doesn't feature any of the Big Five?
Been investigating the bugger for a while I see :lol:
Ultraman Mebius wrote: "Memories really are precious, aren’t they?"
Image Image

User avatar
JAGzilla
Sazer
Posts: 13018
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2011 6:45 pm
Location: Georgia

Re: The Paleontology Thread

Post by JAGzilla »

Voyager wrote: Tue Apr 08, 2025 2:21 am
JAGzilla wrote: Sat Jan 04, 2025 8:58 pm
GojiFan1999 wrote: Sat Jan 04, 2025 4:58 am Diplodocus is a great choice! I’ve always had a soft spot for T. rex, though—there’s just something about how it dominates the scene, you know? I love reading up on how it moved and hunted, though I also find it fascinating how peaceful giants like diplodocus were. I’ve read a bit about its long neck and how it could reach high branches, which is pretty cool. What drew you to diplodocus?
Diplodocus is a great choice, but I think you're replying to a post from 2013 made by a member who hasn't posted in years.

Sorry to go off topic, but a quick question: what is your favorite Showa entry that doesn't feature any of the Big Five?
Been investigating the bugger for a while I see :lol:
Yeah, I figured I'd try asking a question a human G-Fan would get but an AI (hopefully) wouldn't. No answer, so more evidence it isn't human.
"Stop wars and no more accidents. I guess that's all I can ask." -Akio

User avatar
JAGzilla
Sazer
Posts: 13018
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2011 6:45 pm
Location: Georgia

Re: The Paleontology Thread

Post by JAGzilla »

The mainstream media is taking the dire wolf resurrection at face value and going along with Colossal's narrative. It's getting heavy pushback from people who actually understand science, though. Paleontologists are gutting the claims and trashing the dishonest, irresponsible way it's been reported.

https://youtu.be/FvRZKIgNI1I?si=ecPU2yT5PV7fwtK7

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/19ADPjKixy/
"Stop wars and no more accidents. I guess that's all I can ask." -Akio

User avatar
Tyrant_Lizard_King
Sazer
Posts: 13350
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2013 5:57 am
Location: The Planet Trade HQ
Contact:

Re: The Paleontology Thread

Post by Tyrant_Lizard_King »

The very first Ankylosaur trackway has been discovered.

https://www.iflscience.com/first-three- ... -ago-78801
Rocker, paleo buff, cryptid enthusiast, Dragonball fanatic, and lover of comic book, video game, manga, & anime babes!
Follow me on Twitter, if you dare! https://twitter.com/TLK_1983
Image

User avatar
JAGzilla
Sazer
Posts: 13018
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2011 6:45 pm
Location: Georgia

Re: The Paleontology Thread

Post by JAGzilla »

More specifically, it's the first ankylosaurid trackway, as opposed to nodosaurid trackways, which have been found before. It's also the first evidence of ankylosaurids existing in North America between 100 and 84 million years ago. Pretty cool.

And it was found in Alberta, which is nice. Canada can use every little win it can get, these days...
"Stop wars and no more accidents. I guess that's all I can ask." -Akio

User avatar
ShinGojira14
Xilien Halfling
Posts: 5862
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2017 9:08 pm
Location: Under the Wild Montana Skies

Re: The Paleontology Thread

Post by ShinGojira14 »

New Giganotosaurus carolinii material!
https://x.com/TheDarknix/status/1920301260084842850
"William Knifeman! AH! AH! AH!"

Resized ImageResized Image

User avatar
JAGzilla
Sazer
Posts: 13018
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2011 6:45 pm
Location: Georgia

Re: The Paleontology Thread

Post by JAGzilla »

^ Oh, cool! We don't get material from most of these big theropods very often, so it's always exciting when new info is tossed into the mix. Hopefully we hear more soon!

On a more random note, I have a theory that there are three tiers of dinosaur familiarity:

A Tier:The Big Five. Essentially everyone in the developed world can be expected to know these ones by name.

Tyrannosaurus rex
Brontosaurus
Triceratops
Stegosaurus
Velociraptor

B Tier: This one is more nebulous. It basically consists of "well known" dinosaurs, the type that are prominently featured in movies, TV documentaries, kids' books, toy lines, that kind of thing. Most people with a casual interest in dinosaurs, or who went through a dinosaur phase as a kid, will know most of these names. Pretty much everyone will know the more visually distinctive ones by sight, if maybe not by name.

Apatosaurus
Brachiosaurus
Camarasaurus
Diplodocus
Argentinosaurus
Dreadnoughtus
Plateosaurus
Allosaurus
Giganotosaurus
Spinosaurus
Baryonyx
Ceratosaurus
Carnotaurus
Deinonychus
Utahraptor
Pyroraptor
Atrociraptor
Compsognathus
Procompsognathus
Coelophysis
"Troodon"/Stenonychosaurus
Dilophosaurus
Gallimimus
Struthiomimus
Therizinosaurus
Deinocheirus
Majungasaurus
Albertosaurus
Styracosaurus
Torosaurus
Chasmosaurus
Centrosaurus/Monoclonius
Nasutoceratops
Pachyrhinosaurus
Sinoceratops
Kentrosaurus
Ankylosaurus
Euoplocephalus
Borealopelta
Parasaurolophus
Corythosaurus
Edmontosaurus
Hadrosaurus
Maiasaura
Iguanodon
Pachycephalosaurus
Stygimoloch
Hypsilophodon

C Tier: The rest. If you aren't a dedicated dinosaur nerd, you probably won't know many names beyond the ones in B Tier, if that many.
"Stop wars and no more accidents. I guess that's all I can ask." -Akio

User avatar
UltramanGoji
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 18063
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 11:40 am

Re: The Paleontology Thread

Post by UltramanGoji »

I did something similar a while ago in a Discord chat, we were discussing how newer dinosaurs that were discovered within the past, like, 50 years would start to become mainstays in popular culture. We even made a chart (with wrestling terminology lol) to describe it:

Image

Main Events: These are the most famous ones. Apatosaurus and Brontosaurus can be merged together (even though they're separate species) but these ten are the ones everybody knows in some capacity.

Upper Midcard: These are usually the ones you'll see in like, 90% of dinosaur documentaries or media but don't have that global recognition that the first ten do.

Lower Midcard: Same as above, but on a lesser scale of memorability. A few have managed to break into the mainstream, but they still mostly exist in dedicated, nature-focused media.

Respectable Obscurities:
This is the tier that started the whole discussion: people were talking about how there always used to be obscure and weird dinosaurs in books you'd read as a kid that'd stick with you like Kentrosuaurs and we realized that they kind of always remained these "only-cool-kids-remember" types. These are the ones that dinosaur kids from back in the 90's/2000's might remember.

Virtually Unknowns: Finally, these are the ones that are simultaneously the most mainstream, but also the most obscure of the mainstream, if that makes sense. These are "newer" dinosaurs for the most part that have featured in things like Jurassic World or in modern kid's books, names that dinosaur nerds will recognize right away but the general public probably doesn't have any idea about.

I'm sure there's a few we missed, but it's pretty crazy just how small the "mainstream" dinosaur recognition is compared to the vast number of species that have been discovered over the years. There were hundreds more in this tier list that most of us didn't even recognize.
Image

User avatar
MC_Lovecraft
G-Force Personnel
Posts: 889
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2023 10:30 am

Re: The Paleontology Thread

Post by MC_Lovecraft »

UltramanGoji wrote: Fri May 09, 2025 8:52 am I did something similar a while ago in a Discord chat, we were discussing how newer dinosaurs that were discovered within the past, like, 50 years would start to become mainstays in popular culture. We even made a chart (with wrestling terminology lol) to describe it:

Image

Main Events: These are the most famous ones. Apatosaurus and Brontosaurus can be merged together (even though they're separate species) but these ten are the ones everybody knows in some capacity.

Upper Midcard: These are usually the ones you'll see in like, 90% of dinosaur documentaries or media but don't have that global recognition that the first ten do.

Lower Midcard: Same as above, but on a lesser scale of memorability. A few have managed to break into the mainstream, but they still mostly exist in dedicated, nature-focused media.

Respectable Obscurities:
This is the tier that started the whole discussion: people were talking about how there always used to be obscure and weird dinosaurs in books you'd read as a kid that'd stick with you like Kentrosuaurs and we realized that they kind of always remained these "only-cool-kids-remember" types. These are the ones that dinosaur kids from back in the 90's/2000's might remember.

Virtually Unknowns: Finally, these are the ones that are simultaneously the most mainstream, but also the most obscure of the mainstream, if that makes sense. These are "newer" dinosaurs for the most part that have featured in things like Jurassic World or in modern kid's books, names that dinosaur nerds will recognize right away but the general public probably doesn't have any idea about.

I'm sure there's a few we missed, but it's pretty crazy just how small the "mainstream" dinosaur recognition is compared to the vast number of species that have been discovered over the years. There were hundreds more in this tier list that most of us didn't even recognize.
Oh, I like this. 8-)

I might argue that Spinosaurus has managed to break into the Main Event in recent years. They turn up in practically all dinosaur media these days. I'll admit to being hopelessly biased though. :lol:

User avatar
Tyrant_Lizard_King
Sazer
Posts: 13350
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2013 5:57 am
Location: The Planet Trade HQ
Contact:

Re: The Paleontology Thread

Post by Tyrant_Lizard_King »

A new species of ancient arthropod has been named after Mothra.

https://abcnews.go.com/amp/US/paleontol ... =121792677
Rocker, paleo buff, cryptid enthusiast, Dragonball fanatic, and lover of comic book, video game, manga, & anime babes!
Follow me on Twitter, if you dare! https://twitter.com/TLK_1983
Image

User avatar
LegendZilla
Sazer
Posts: 11044
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2013 3:57 am
Location: British Columbia, Canada

Re: The Paleontology Thread

Post by LegendZilla »

Tyrant_Lizard_King wrote: Wed May 14, 2025 6:22 pm A new species of ancient arthropod has been named after Mothra.

https://abcnews.go.com/amp/US/paleontol ... =121792677
An Anomalocarid?

User avatar
Tyrant_Lizard_King
Sazer
Posts: 13350
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2013 5:57 am
Location: The Planet Trade HQ
Contact:

Re: The Paleontology Thread

Post by Tyrant_Lizard_King »

A juvenile hadrosaur "mummy" has been discovered in Alberta.

https://dailygalaxy.com/2025/05/scienti ... preserved/
Rocker, paleo buff, cryptid enthusiast, Dragonball fanatic, and lover of comic book, video game, manga, & anime babes!
Follow me on Twitter, if you dare! https://twitter.com/TLK_1983
Image

User avatar
JAGzilla
Sazer
Posts: 13018
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2011 6:45 pm
Location: Georgia

Re: The Paleontology Thread

Post by JAGzilla »

It's always cool when that happens. I assume this probably isn't an Edmontosaurus, given the location, so it might provide some major insight into a species we know less about. Fingers crossed for Parasaurolophus! It would be crazy if we suddenly get some idea of what their skin color or pattern was like.
"Stop wars and no more accidents. I guess that's all I can ask." -Akio

User avatar
LegendZilla
Sazer
Posts: 11044
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2013 3:57 am
Location: British Columbia, Canada

Re: The Paleontology Thread

Post by LegendZilla »

^Hope they find a T-Rex mummy one day, or any large theropod for that matter. Besides, I think it's more likely to be an Edmontosaurus given it's a more recent species than Parasaurolophus.

User avatar
JAGzilla
Sazer
Posts: 13018
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2011 6:45 pm
Location: Georgia

Re: The Paleontology Thread

Post by JAGzilla »

If Wikipedia is accurate, no Edmontosaurus fossils have been found in Dinosaur Provincial Park. It's an earlier formation. The park's Wikipedia page gives a list of the dinosaurs that are known from its rocks.
"Stop wars and no more accidents. I guess that's all I can ask." -Akio

User avatar
Tyrant_Lizard_King
Sazer
Posts: 13350
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2013 5:57 am
Location: The Planet Trade HQ
Contact:

Re: The Paleontology Thread

Post by Tyrant_Lizard_King »

LegendZilla wrote: Tue May 20, 2025 2:05 pm ^Hope they find a T-Rex mummy one day, or any large theropod for that matter. Besides, I think it's more likely to be an Edmontosaurus given it's a more recent species than Parasaurolophus.
There is some Tyrannosaurus skin impressions but not many. Same goes for Carnotaurus.
Rocker, paleo buff, cryptid enthusiast, Dragonball fanatic, and lover of comic book, video game, manga, & anime babes!
Follow me on Twitter, if you dare! https://twitter.com/TLK_1983
Image

User avatar
LegendZilla
Sazer
Posts: 11044
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2013 3:57 am
Location: British Columbia, Canada

Re: The Paleontology Thread

Post by LegendZilla »

Anyone else care to dicuss the Eocene's Uintatheirum?

Image

This is my dad's favoite prehistoric mammal. What is your opinion on this creature? Being such a primitvie creature, It famously had a highly underdeveloped brain. Besides, where exactly it lies in the mammalian family tree still remains a hotly debated subject. Due to its similarities to modern ungulates like Rhinos, some studies have suggested a distant relationship within the greater clade Laurasiatheria, but even that isn't widely accepted. Some even believe it may not even be a proper placental mammal. Do you have any suggestions?

User avatar
JAGzilla
Sazer
Posts: 13018
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2011 6:45 pm
Location: Georgia

Re: The Paleontology Thread

Post by JAGzilla »

Uintatherium is definitely one of the prehistoric mammals that exists. I won't say I know much about it or have any particular feelings about it, but it's big, ugly, and distinctive. Memorable. One of those fairly basic animals I vaguely remember from books as a kid, and I'm pretty sure it turned up sometimes in those bags of cheap little plastic dinosaurs.
"Stop wars and no more accidents. I guess that's all I can ask." -Akio

Post Reply