I'll watch for this next time. ToMG's been on my rewatch list for a bit but I also keep putting it off because it would kill me to burn this one out.LSD Jellyfish wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2025 5:30 pmI might be wrong, but upon my rewatch I’ve interpreted Mafune’s claims and ostracisation being a more direct result of trying to mind control a giant dinosaur.
I personally used to love this interpretation of the film and viewed it as a fun way to loop the Showa series' origins back to it's present circumstances without it feeling too forced or phoned in. I've drifted to wondering if it's more coincidental and I'm just looking at it with some retroactive continuity glasses like a dumb baby fan, but the flashback always makes me reconsider if it might have some text to it; probably, if Honda were alive, and talked to random annoying Americans, I might actually ask him what he thought about this.LSD Jellyfish wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2025 5:30 pmBut, also, consider the fact that this controversy happened in the past. If TOMG took place in 1975, then it’s possible that the events portrayed in the film with this film occurred 1950s, when Godzilla didn’t exist. Even if this is post 1954, if we look solely at a Godzilla timeline, then really monsters don’t start appearing Willy-nilly till the 60s. Possible to assume that if even if Godzilla, Angurius, and Rodan existed, people in scientific communities would be very skeptical of Titanosaurus living peacefully under everyone’s noses.
This used to bother me, but now it doesn’t.
I think this also adds, and justifies, Mafune’s bitterness. Monsters do exist, so Mafune was absolutely right. It gets worse if you consider they wind up controlling all the monsters in DAM anyways.
Also, I do like that little scene of Rodan, Ghidorah, and Manda, even if it’s stock footage. Despite the low monster count, it still makes everything feel cohesive.