Quote by Tyler:
^That's one pissed off Wilford Brimly.
I always thought the beast looked more like Jack Elamb.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=85PcMJ9D8X0
^That's one pissed off Wilford Brimly.
UltramanGoji wrote: Cranky because you got mad I implied GFW isn't a good movie aren't you
Chrispy_G wrote:I'll say it one last time, Trump wins in a landslide.
I'll gladly eat crow if it doesn't turn out that way....but at this point it feels painfully obvious, as it has for months.
I would've actually preferred if the movie would keep the Loch Ness Monster from being aggressive or confrontational, as that helps the viewer suspend belief and connect with the very quiet monster we're all familiar with in modern folklore. Something to the effect of someone credible creating a stir and interest in the LNM again in the present day, claiming to have seen it or gotten a picture. Scientists and other experts are granted a submarine and other equipment to put the myth to rest ... or make an unprecedented discovery. There is a distress call and the submarine confirms there is a giant creature that's attacking the sub, sinking it. Then they launch attack subs and such to kill the creature, thinking it aggressive. They chase it around and it fights back, or maybe it comes on land briefly too, yadda yadda. I came up with that on the fly so it's not well thought out, but a lesson in man just destroying what we don't understand and leaving some creatures alone would've made sense. It was only defending itself when it felt threatened, otherwise it had been benevolent since forever.RogueShuffler wrote:I think its sweet that they werent just going to make it a movie about discovering Nessie and saving it or learning about it...no this Nessie is a brute and went on a rampage destroying an oil rig. I really wish this was made. Oh Toho WHYYY!!!
UltramanGoji wrote: Cranky because you got mad I implied GFW isn't a good movie aren't you
Chrispy_G wrote:I'll say it one last time, Trump wins in a landslide.
I'll gladly eat crow if it doesn't turn out that way....but at this point it feels painfully obvious, as it has for months.
Not to flare anything up because I'm sorry you ended up in a disagreement with the other poster, but why would this forum have "other freaks"? You probably aren't a "freak" and we aren't full of them here anyway. Is it because we're all fans of classic giant monster/sci-fi movies? That's really not "freakish".Viva la revolucion! wrote:Sorry if I called him an idiot but people bully me everywhere and I thought this was gonna be like heaven because theyre were other freaks like me and isntead people call me names
GTU wrote:There are so many concept versions of Bagan they could give him his own toyline. That's why I'm banking on a Monsterarts sub-line called SH Baganarts.
The synopsis on the main site discusses that.GodzillaFan1992 wrote:So why was this movie scrapped?
Hammer backed out of the deal.GodzillaFan1992 wrote:So why was this movie scrapped?
UltramanGoji wrote: Cranky because you got mad I implied GFW isn't a good movie aren't you
Chrispy_G wrote:I'll say it one last time, Trump wins in a landslide.
I'll gladly eat crow if it doesn't turn out that way....but at this point it feels painfully obvious, as it has for months.
Don't know. Had read in The Book of Sea Monsters that Nessie in the flick would've been made larger than before due to growth hormones dumped into the loch. Which would've in turn, made her more aggressive to boot. Maybe not Godzilla sized, but big enough to wreck an oil rig singlehandedly.Godzillian wrote:Really sounded like a cool film. Would have loved it as a kid and it would've been a pretty nice addition to the Showa era. How big was Nessie gonna be in the film?